Throw in how different the gameplay would be from games like Advanced Warfare and Black Ops III, and you have a way to shut down all of the skeptics who say that Call of Duty is too similar from year to year.įollowing the breakup of Yugoslavia, Bosnia and Herzegovina was wrought with artillery attacks, ethnic cleansing, and massacres. The body count alone is staggering, but when you add in the well-known generals, the big iconic battles, and the importance that the war held for the United States, it has every component a game needs to possess a great storyline that doesn’t pull any punches. When you look at gruesome wars in America’s past, the Civil War is certainly up there.

Sure, the original Black Ops had some Vietnam sequences, but why not devote an entire game to the war, which has been the subject of countless films? The warfare, the story, and even the soundtrack of the Vietnam War were unlike any conflict the United States has ever been a part of, and could make for a truly compelling campaign. One of the most controversial and brutal wars the United States has ever participated in has yet to receive a truly spectacular game. Black Ops III is set in stone – and to its credit it plays pretty well so far – but what about the inevitable 2016 entry of the franchise when Infinity Ward takes its next crack? Let’s take a look at 10 settings that could be better for the franchise than the current near-future trend.

The near-future setting of Call of Duty: Black Ops III is interesting from a gameplay perspective, but with three consecutive games relying on that setting, the franchise is sacrificing one of the key things that made the multiple-developer approach to the franchise work well.

Call of duty civil war